<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Comentarios al libro: THE SCIENCE DELUSION]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[https://api.biblioeteca.com/biblioeteca.web/titulo/the-science-delusion]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[The Science Delusion is an answer to Richard Dawkins God Delusion. Part A of The Science Delusion commences with a criticism of Karl Popper’s Philosophy of Science. This is because some spokesmen for evolution like to use Karl Popper’s testability criterion as a categorisation argument against creationism. Some spokesmen for evolution like to say things like ‘creationism is not testable therefore it is not science’. In part Popper’s philosophy owes its inspiration to David Hume’s well worn problem of induction. Part A of The Science Delusion goes to some trouble to put Hume’s original problem and the modern problem of induction in a simple and easy to understand argument, and then goes on to provide a solution to the problem of induction. Part B of The Science Delusion uses the lessons of part A to address problems with arguments and problems with the theory of evolution. Regarding the ‘creationism is not testable and therefore it is not science’ argument for example, we should be ...]]></description>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 11:39:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<language>es</language>
<copyright>Copyright 202 6BiblioEteca Technologies SL</copyright>

</channel>
</rss>
